Anais do Workshop em Engenharia de Requisitos
Actas del Workshop en Ingeniería de Requerimientos
Proceedings of Workshop on Requirements Engineering


A cada ano, o WER convida a apresentação de trabalhos descrevendo novas pesquisas ou experiências no campo da Engenharia de Requisitos. Trabalhos que apresentem resultados originais em ambos os pontos de vista de pesquisa, ensino e indústria em todos os aspectos da Engenharia de Requisitos são bem-vindos. O processo de seleção considerara a aplicabilidade e relevância para Engenharia de Requisitos, originalidade e clareza. Todos os artigos devem ser submetidos através do sistema de submissão somente em PDF, de acordo com o formato LNCS. Os artigos devem ser escritos em português, espanhol ou inglês. Qualquer artigo que: exceda o limite de páginas, não esteja no escopo da conferência ou não siga as diretrizes de formatação poderá ser rejeitado sem revisão. Todas as submissões serão revisadas por pelo menos três membros do Comitê do Programa. Todos os trabalhos aceitos serão publicados com o acesso aberto através do repositório WERpapers.

Cada año, el WER invita a presentar trabajos que describan investigaciones o experiencias novedosas en el campo de la ingeniería de requisitos. Los trabajos que presenten resultados originales sobre la investigación, la enseñanza y los puntos de vista industriales sobre todos los aspectos de la ingeniería de requisitos son bienvenidos. El proceso de selección considerará la aplicabilidad y la relevancia para la ingeniería de requisitos, la originalidad y la claridad. Todos los documentos deben enviarse a través del sistema de envío en PDF solamente, de acuerdo con el formato LNCS. Las presentaciones deben estar escritas en portugués, español o inglés. Cualquier documento que: supere el límite de la página, no se encuentre dentro del alcance de la conferencia o no siga las pautas de formato podrá ser rechazado sin revisión. Todos los trabajos serán revisados por al menos tres miembros del Comité del Programa. Todos los trabajos aceptados se publicarán con acceso abierto a través del repositorio de WERpapers.

Each year the WER invites submission of papers describing novel research or experiences in the field of Requirements Engineering. Papers presenting original results on both research, teaching and industrial viewpoints on all aspects of Requirements Engineering are welcome. The selection process will consider applicability and relevance to Requirements Engineering, originality, and clarity. Any paper that: exceeds the page limit, is not within the scope of the conference, or do not follow the formatting guidelines may be desk-rejected without review. All submissions are going to be peer-reviewed by at least three members of the Program Committee. All accepted papers will be published as Open Access through the WERpapers repository.



WER - Statement of Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Workshop on Requirements Engineering Ibero-American Conference Series is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial board is responsible for, among other, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable and the WER does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submit articles to the Conference Proceedings: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either fully or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the WER are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines).

Section A: Publication and authorship
Section B: Editors’ responsibilities
Section C: Authors’ responsibilities
Section D: Reviewers’ responsibilities

Section A: Publication and authorship
All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least three international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
The possible decisions include acceptance or rejection.
If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
No research can be included in more than one publication.

Section B: Editors’ responsibilities
Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
Editors ensure that the submitted fullpapers are reviewed without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Section C: Authors’ responsibilities
Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
Authors must participate in the peer review process.
Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

Section D: Reviewers’ responsibilities
Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

For more information, please go to COPE’s web site https://publicationethics.org/